LICENSE became AGPL-3.0-only in 037eb24, but both READMEs still told readers
the project was MIT — the one place a user actually looks before deciding what
they may do with it. The two "license notes" underneath were MIT-shaped as
well: attribution and a disclaimer, with no mention of copyleft at all.
They now say what AGPL actually requires, including section 13, which is the
clause that matters most here: Felis is a hosting platform reached over a
network, so a modified deployment owes its source to the people using it even
if no binary is ever distributed. Leaving that unsaid was the part that could
mislead someone into a violation they never intended.
flyemoji
Lemon-miaow