+4
−3
+4
−3
Loading
LICENSE became AGPL-3.0-only in 037eb248, but both READMEs still told readers the project was MIT — the one place a user actually looks before deciding what they may do with it. The two "license notes" underneath were MIT-shaped as well: attribution and a disclaimer, with no mention of copyleft at all. They now say what AGPL actually requires, including section 13, which is the clause that matters most here: Felis is a hosting platform reached over a network, so a modified deployment owes its source to the people using it even if no binary is ever distributed. Leaving that unsaid was the part that could mislead someone into a violation they never intended.